Posts
Representing the old Paleo-conservative view, Pat Buchanan has predictably framed the argument in terms of Iran vs. Israel; rather than Iran vs. the world. Buchanan also avoided taking a clear position on the larger Iran nuclear dilemma. His article reads like that of a referee or moderator who spells out the general dilemma and then ends it all with; “over to you Mr. President.” Buchanan seems instinctivly searching for a fight on Iran with the Neocon movment but still hasn’t found a point of contention to sink his teeth into. The Neocon is hoping, and is reasonably confident that Mr. Buchanan will ultimately have no choice but to concede that an Iran armed with Nuclear weapons is a mortal threat to the United States and the free world in general, independent of Israel, which we all know he has never cared for.
Jacoby: Don't go wobbly on Iran
24-01-2006: Merrill, JPMorgan raise 2006 US oil price forecasts
Recommended! Human Events: Confounding the Mullahs of Iran
Tonight’s #Top20Posts: Biden-Harris FEMA still ignoring storm victims in
North Carolina
-
*Sponsored by directorblue.substack.com. Follow us on Twitter @directorblue*
.
20
https://t.co/8yEHVMkeQo pic.twitter.com/4p2Xr6jBm0
— 🏛 Aristophanes ...
3 hours ago
Pat is a good man .. he might be walking a fine line
ReplyDeletemynewsbot.com
Never miss a headline
Mcrubble,
ReplyDeleteI agree in many ways, every time I tend to agree with Buchanan he goes off the deep end.
The above comment illustrates that some folks simply don't get it. To believe that a nuclear armed Iran is not a US problem shows a scary level of simplicity.
ReplyDeleteJoe