OK, lets review the moment. Unlike Bush, Nobel peace prize winner Barack Obama attacked a Muslim Arab country without even seeking congressional approval. Obama attacked an oil producing country (no blood for oil?) that represented no threat to the United States in any real way, ZERO. He attacked a dictator who by any standard of measurement was/is far less dangerous than Saddam Hussein was, by a factor of at least 100. He attacked a country and then headed off to what amounted to nothing more than tourist jaunt to Brazil. But hey, forget the US congress, the elected representatives of the American people, at least he sought the approval of the Arab League.
Of course, we support the mission and wish US forces, and wild-man Obama's policy of going all Bushy on Gaddafi. We hope for nothing but success in toppling another crazy Arab dictator. But the blatant hypocrisy is...ah... stunning to say the least.
UPDATE: NYT female photographer, repeatedly sexually assaulted by Gaddafi loyalists... shades of Lara Logan
Everything in the Middle East Means the Opposite
-
Even as Islamic Jihadists are taking over Syria, ethnically cleansing Kurds
and terrorizing Christians, the media is hailing the new “inclusive” regime ...
9 hours ago
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please keep it clean. Comments do not reflect the opinion of this blog and are the sole opinion of the commenter. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason. Of course, opposing views are welcomed.
Auto-flagged and monitored IP addresses:
Teksavvy - IP 76.10.141, Onterio, Canada.
Charter Communications - IP 68.188.68. Ballwin, Missouri