Afghan Christian, Abdul Rahman, May Go Free "For Lack of Evidence"

Lack of Evidence? Wow, does this mean that if there was “evidence” then he would have been stoned to death? Getting him off on a manufactured technicality to avoid a gigantic diplomatic incident is, of course, much preferable than watching him being “pulled to pieces,” as a “moderate” cleric threatened, but this does not solve the basic issue at hand: Why is Islam so intolerant and insecure that the Law would require the DEATH PENALTY of someone who chooses to exercise a different personal religions expression?
Tags: Afghanistan, Abdul Rahman, Christianity, Islam, Terror

Openly and Proudly: America takes side of Israel