


Prager’s Position: "It has to do with the fact that it's not the Bible," he said. "If a Mormon-American decided to substitute the Book of Mormon for the Bible, I would have the same problem. If a scientologist wanted L. Ron Hubbard's 'Dyanetics' to be the book, I would have a problem," Prager said. "George Washington began this movement. He was the one to bring a Bible and swear on it. Every president except one, Teddy Roosevelt, because it was right after the assassination of James McKinley and they didn't have time for a Bible. And every president has done this."
CAIR’s Position: "No one who holds such bigoted, intolerant and divisive views should be in a policy-making position at a taxpayer-funded institution that seeks to educate Americans about the destructive impact hatred has had, and continues to have, on every society. As a presidential appointee, Prager's continued presence on the council would send a negative message to Muslims worldwide about America's commitment to religious tolerance."
Wow! Is that an invitation for Muslims "worldwide" to riot? Because we all know how closely folks in the Muslim world follow who is on the Board of the US Holocaust Memorial Museum. For a Muslim Extreemist group like CAIR to lecture anyone on "tolorance" is a bit much.

Mosque to get police guard for bikini rally
Franchising Jihad
Bush accepts Bolton's U.N. resignation
The Rape of Europe
Iran blocks access to top websites
'US won't launch preemptive strike against Teheran'
Gingrich: The 1st Amendment Is Not a Suicide Pact
CAIR is to tolerance what rabies is to doggie obedience school
ReplyDeleteand of course they don't apply such standards to their own candidates who hold explicitly bigoted views or their home country of saudi arabia